Analyzing the Root Causes of the Decrease in Test Scores: A Closer Look at the 2024 NAEP Results
- Goomi
- Feb 2
- 4 min read
The recent release of the 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) results has sent shockwaves through the education sector. Test scores in reading and math have plummeted to their lowest levels since 1992. With this alarming trend, many are questioning the reasons behind these declines. Educators, parents, and policymakers are grappling with the implications and what can be done to turn things around. This blog post will explore the possible causes of reduced test scores, their impact, and actionable solutions for improvement.
Understanding the NAEP Results
The NAEP, often called the "Nation’s Report Card," measures student achievement in the United States. The 2024 results show a concerning drop in scores for elementary and middle school students, with a 7% decline in reading proficiency and a 10% drop in math scores compared to previous years. Critics are focused on several factors that may have contributed to these declines, especially the role of pandemic-related school closures and the influence of teacher unions.
These results are alarming not only for their immediate impact on educational quality but also for their potential long-term consequences on workforce readiness. Urgent reforms are needed to close learning gaps exacerbated by recent events and contextualize this troubling trend.

The Impact of the Pandemic
The link between the COVID-19 pandemic and declining test scores is undeniable. Critics argue that lengthy school closures, driven by both health concerns and teacher union policies, have led to significant interruptions in education.
For instance, a report from the Brookings Institution found that 30% of students lacked access to appropriate technology during remote learning. This gap was especially pronounced among low-income households, where students faced additional challenges such as inadequate support and resources for effective learning. A study from the National Bureau of Economic Research estimates that students lost about 1.5 years worth of reading progress because of the pandemic, with younger students affected the most.
Not all closures had uniform effects; however, many education analysts argue that the lack of consistent, face-to-face instruction will have a lasting negative impact on student performance.

Federal Aid and Its Limitations
In response to the educational challenges posed by COVID-19, the federal government provided critical funding through the American Rescue Plan of 2021. Schools received approximately $122 billion aimed at addressing learning losses. Despite this investment, many educators report that the effectiveness of these funds has not met expectations.
The crux of the issue lies in implementation. If resources are funneled into ineffective tutoring or mental health programs without a clear strategy, they may not produce the desired results. According to a recent survey, about 40% of school administrators indicated that federal aid was not sufficient for implementing effective programs to address learning gaps.
Without a focused approach to utilizing funding, it becomes increasingly difficult to tackle the complexity of low test scores.
Widening Achievement Gap
The 2024 NAEP results shine a light on the growing achievement gap between high-performing and low-performing students. As test scores decline, talented students have managed to maintain their performance, while many underserved students continue to fall behind.
For example, the median test score for high-performing students dropped just 2 points, while learners in the bottom quartile saw declines exceeding 10 points. This divergence raises serious concerns about equity in education. If not addressed, these gaps may perpetuate cycles of disadvantage for generations.
The widening gap challenges the goal of providing equal opportunities for all students and may have broader societal implications.
Exploring Potential Solutions
Addressing these issues requires a multifaceted approach. One potential solution gaining traction is the promotion of school choice and charter schools. Supporters argue that fostering competition can lead to innovations and improved educational outcomes. For context, students in charter schools have shown an average of 3-6% higher scores in reading and math compared to their peers in traditional public schools.
However, the effectiveness of school choice can vary. Critics argue that without a focus on quality, expanding options may worsen existing challenges rather than solving them.
Investing in targeted tutoring and mentoring programs for disadvantaged students is another promising avenue. Research demonstrates that well-structured intervention strategies can lead to academic gains. For instance, students participating in intensive tutoring programs have seen improvements between 10-20% in their math scores over a single academic year.
The Path Forward
The 2024 NAEP results signal a critical moment for educators, parents, and policymakers. The sharp declines in student test scores emphasize the urgent need to examine the root causes of this decline thoughtfully.
As discussions unfold regarding the role of pandemic closures, inadequate federal aid, and widening achievement gaps, strategic action is paramount. By fostering collaboration and engaging in meaningful conversations, stakeholders can work towards creating an education system that offers equitable opportunities for every student.
Understanding the complex factors influencing test scores can help pave the way to a brighter future in education—where every child can thrive.

Comments